🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to scrub Black history and experience from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Contemporary Black History Month.